Does Your Skill in Bed Match Your Appearance?

“Sexy Breast” by adamr.

Darling, a true lady takes off her dignity with her clothes and
does her whorish best. At other times you can be as modest
and dignified as your persona requires.

Robert A. Heinlein

Lazarus Long and The Long Family

Robert A. Heinlein is one of my top five favourite writers of all time.  He was considered a “hard” science fiction writer.  His stories featured bulkheads and rivets, and more than enough references to physics and mathematics equations to keep the average geek happy, including me.

But his bigger novels wandered a lot further afield than Einstein’s theory of relativity.  Heinlein had plenty to say about history, politics, religion…and sex.  Sex was one of his favourite subjects.  Polyamory, group sex, gay sex and just about every variation that romance novels are just starting to deal with Heinlein had already featured in his science fiction novels.  Considering that he was writing in the seventies and eighties when he was at his peak in popularity, this was quite an achievement.  Heinlein was constantly in the best sellers lists in his day.

The above quote from Heinlein is from his 1973 book, Time Enough for Love.  It is my favourite Heinlein novel, depending on my mood — I sometimes drop it to the number two position in favour of To Sail Beyond The Sunset, which is an unofficial sequel.  Both of them deal with the serial lives of Lazarus Long and the Long Family.  They are both massive books — Time is over six hundred pages in paperback, and Sunset is 448 pages.  The above quote was something said by Maureen Johnson Long, Lazarus’ mother, and the main character in the sequel.

Maureen Johnston Long

Maureen was raised just before the first world war, but she was trained with a different moral standard than the mores of the day.  She was taught to enjoy sex, but to blend in with society at all times for reasons that I can’t explain without providing spoilers.  Outwardly she was a corsetted, buttoned-up matron with an impecable reputation, not a hair out of place, who didn’t drink, smoke or swear and who looked like she didn’t understand male anatomy from the chin downwards despite bearing multiple children.  Behind closed and locked doors, she bedded nearly any man or woman she wanted, sometimes two and three at a time.  Sex was her favourite occupation and when she wasn’t actively engaged in coitis, she was mentally planning her next conquest.  All her partners remained friends, if not committed fans, for life.

For a book written in the 1970’s and a character set in the 1900’s, Maureen’s attitudes and behaviour were shocking.

Sexual Hunting These Days…

These days, I suspect that the reverse pattern is the norm, more often than not.   The prevailing attitude toward sex that seems to be encouraged as the social norm is one of experimentation and multiple serial partners.  Multiple simultaneous partners is not always frowned upon, if the situation is temporary.   Clothing has evolved to the point where social nudity is legal in some countries, states and provinces, while clothing itself is so provocative, nudity is a waste of time.  It is perfectly acceptable to walk around the shopping mall with your bra on display.  No one looks twice anymore.  You can wear a top that stops just under your bra and pants that stop just above your panties and again, no one will say a word.  You can wear see-through pants or a see-through skirt so that your underwear is visible, and again….

This is the complete reverse of Maureen Long’s time, when everything was buttoned up, covered up and hidden away.  She did all her sexual hunting with her eyes and feminine charm…and a wordless promise that she delivered in spades once the door was locked.  In Sunset, she said “I aim to be a panic in bed,” and she spent her formative years learning what she could about sex, and how to be better at it.

Maureen Long implied with a glance, or perhaps a twinkle in her eyes, when she thought she could get away with it.

We in our day and age pour out the equivalent of a small nuclear power plant in heated promises with our lingerie, make-up, perfume, short hemlines, hosiery, high heels, clothing that clings to every curve, exposed flesh, and on and on…

Are we living up to the promises we’re making?

Or do we get behind the closed door […or into the back seat of the car, or the back alley, or the meadow…] and start to fumble?  Or worse, roll right into the same old-same old moves we always make and have been making for ten years now?

If it takes a Master’s Degree to earn the corner office, shouldn’t it at least warrant some education and self-learning to master basic sex techniques?  And shouldn’t that education be on-going, or at least brushed-up once in a while?  If Maureen Long delivered a trip around the moon based on a twinkle of the eye, we should all be delivering competent and varied sex based on the flagrant advertising we do on a daily basis.

Have you ever taken a formal sex class?  Probably not.  Have you ever determined to improve your sexual performance, and methodically “learned” and improved your techniques?  Or have you just picked things up with experiences?  I suspect most of us just drifted along, learning as we went.  It’s a very pleasant way to improve, but it would also be fair to say it’s a form of false advertising, too.

The resources for learning how to provide better sex experiences for your partner are everywhere these days, and many of them are childproof, virus free and couples-oriented.  The one-handed, single white male, porn-oriented sites are not what I’m referring to.

Here are two of the best I I know.  There are others, and these sites have links:

Dick ‘n’ Jane

Get Lusty

_____________

 

 

 

 

2 Comments

  1. jules hanson October 29, 2012 at 12:54 pm

    Tracy,
    Although I’ve never graduated, I believe I have a PHD in sexual behaviour, experimentation and self-guided research!
    I believe that our current dress code does not define our sexual behaviour in any way. It’s simply fashion.
    In my teenage years I realized that I was the “innocent looking one” in the group. And therefore my behaviour did not equate to my looks.
    I’m still considered somewhat conservative in appearance and enjoy the mystery that I wish to emanate at times.
    OH! OH! OH! I could go on and on and on about this topic! LOL

    Great subject. I’d be willing to share my research findings when you wish to write a book on this topic.

    • Tracy October 29, 2012 at 1:23 pm

      Hi Jules:

      Thanks for commenting. An expert voice on the topic, even a self-studied expert, is more than welcome.

      I don’t think fashion defines sexual behaviour. Most women wouldn’t. But subconsciously, I suspect most heterosexually-inclined men do. They can’t help it. It’s hard-wired into their testosterone. They see a women in a sexy dress, or with their bra on display and they stop thinking and their libido goes into gear. For many woman, the reverse is slowly becoming true, too, as we learn that visual cues work for us, too. We are learning to become aroused visually, as well, so a hot man, dressed just right, will stir our “interest” as strongly as a woman in a skimpy cocktail dress will do it for straight men and lesbians.

      If you’re dressing to attract male attention (and most club clothing, for instance, is designed to do exactly that), then you’re sending a very defined sexual message. Can you deliver on the message once the door is closed? Considering the advertising that some clothes can put out there these days, I was proposing that a lot of people (including a *lot* of men, too!) fail to live up to the advertising. The talk and the walk is all there is.

      But there are ways to correct that.

      I seriously doubt I’d ever write a book on this one. Fiction is too much fun (still).

      Cheers,

      Tracy

Comments are closed.