6 Responses to “The Difficulties of Writing Really Old Erotic Historical Romances.”

Comments

Read below or add a comment...

  1. Christine

    Hi Tracy,

    I’m not sure how you writers do what you do to begin with. But your right I don’t want to hear Bullocks. LOL I’m reading Julia’s book now Dangerous Desires, It’s great, as far as historical accuracy, that’s not why I read. I just want great characters, that I fall in love with and great sex scenes! If I’ve got all three I’ve usually read a fantastic book!

    Thanks for the education you gave me on ereaders. I think I’ve decided to get the sony touch too. Thanks again, Your fan, Christine

  2. Thanks for a fascinating post. As someone working on her first full length historical erotic romance, set in the later Victorian era, I found it extremely interesting and relevant.

    • You’re welcome, Portia. Hope it helps.

      Good luck with your book.

      Tracy

  3. Especially in historical sex scenes set in very early periods, I will use Anglo-Saxon terminology for body parts where there is no chronologically accurate term available.

    Um, yes. But you’re writing in modern English, not Old English or Anglo Saxon. Quite honestly nothing pulls me out of someone’s writing like the use of some strange archaism like “tarse” (dreadful word) for a dick. I think there’s a lot of confusion about the role of explicitness in erotic writing, and one does not necessarily guarantee the other.

    I do like the classical bird imagery for the penis, in Catullus, for instance, which gives a whole erotic charge to Lesbia’s sparrow, and that particular metaphor was used well into the 18c.

Leave A Comment...

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Bad Behavior has blocked 367 access attempts in the last 7 days.